Skip to main content

From instant food, to Instacart, to next day delivery courtesy of your favorite billionaire. The simplicity of the convenience has swallowed itself whole into something that behaviorally might be difficult to turn back from. One of the highest rising in the world of neoliberal consumerism is fast fashion. The aggrandization this sub-industry has throughout a global consumer’s point of view is a bit shocking to say the least. Fashion Nova, Zara, Shein, & recently Temu, are a few of the fast fashion juggernauts that have swept the globe in convincing men & women everywhere why they need this cheap & poorly made item of clothing at $20. Merriam-Webster defines fast fashion as “an approach to the design, creation, and marketing of clothing fashions that emphasizes making fashion trends quickly and cheaply available to consumers” (Meriam Webster). This quick availability to consumers is unfortunately linked to the quick decline in geoeconomics as well. There are many challenges that come with the negligent consumerism from fast fashion. The impact of excessive clothing-waste is the most obvious issue this phenomenon creates. Due to the cheap cost of materials, labor & manufacturing; often times these fast fashion brands conduct their work in sweat shops that create extremely hazardous situations for the workers & the environments that they are found in within developing countries. The excess poor-quality clothing is producing real estate in land dumps that creates heavier hazards. The trendiness & accessibility allows the consumer to feel fashionable without the commitment to a price tag from luxury designer brands. However, they also neglect to take into consideration the quality & craftsmanship behind that higher price tag.

If someone buys a pair of boots from Shein, & another pair from Prada; the long-term ability will be clear. The Prada boot provides a quality you can trust, a manufacturing that will last years (if handled well), & the craft time that will be worth the money you spend. Why? Because it is designed with concern for the consumer. Whereas, our fast fashion counterparts, are not interested in that time consuming cycle. The profit & allowing their consumers to remain ignorant in convenience is suffice.  Besides contributing to the increased “first world problems”, there is the underlining environmental impact.  Based on a scholarly article by Emma Williams for the Journal for Global Business & Community, “overtime, chemicals, and dyes from the fabric of these clothing pieces begin to seep into the ground. This leaching can cause toxic materials to “be taken up by plants and animals, contaminate a human drinking water supply or volatilize and contaminate the indoor air in overlying buildings” (Williams 2022). Many of these sweatshops are also contributing to excessive water usage that adds to the flowing of pollution, clothing microfibers, plastics & other toxins into the ocean. With billions of people unable to access clean drinking water, the immoral manufacturing of these clothes hits an ethical code for many. However, it is not limited to the poor working habits for individuals, or water quality. Research shows elevated carbon & greenhouse emissions that fits as a cherry on top to this fashion fiasco. The fashion industry is guilty of producing intense greenhouse emissions. However, polyester, a textile prominently used in fast fashion, “produced about 1.5 trillion pounds (706 billion kilograms) of greenhouse gases on its own in 2015. While the fashion industry’s greenhouse emissions are already high, according to Elisa Tonda, Head of Consumption and Production Unit at the United Nations Environment Programme, “if we carry on with a business-as-usual approach, the greenhouse gas emissions from the industry are expected to rise by almost 50% by 2030” (Williams 2022).

Of course there are many simple solutions consumers can do today. Donate clothing’s that have lost trend. Many donation centers can be found across America, and some places will provide compensation for your items. Another obvious option is not becoming bait to the mass retail chain. Not every item that is seen as “trendy” needs to be bought. It will not only save consumers a surprising amount but can create desire for the individual to enjoy the retail experience again by waiting for an anticipated product. Let it be noted that, the luxury fashion industry is not exempt from the environmental limitations they are imposing globally. However, the accelerated speed at which fast fashion companies are producing is not sustainable for their consumers nor for the environment. It will be a challenge to convince the ‘liberated mind’ to believe they can make an impact from not shopping till they drop, but the constraints can truly produce promising environmental effects long term.

 

 

 

 

 

References

Williams, E. (2022, July 6). Appalling or advantageous? exploring the impacts of fast fashion from environmental, social, and Economic Perspectives: Published in Journal for Global Business and Community. Journal for Global Business and Community. https://jgbc.scholasticahq.com/article/36873-appalling-or-advantageous-exploring-the- impacts-of-fast-fashion-from-environmental-social-and-economic-perspectives

Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Fast fashion definition & meaning. Merriam-Webster. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fast%20fashion

Leave a Reply